Background
Review
4/5
The Biggest Estate on Earth: How Aborigines Made Australia
Synopsis
Across Australia, early Europeans commented again and again that the land looked like a park. With extensive grassy patches and pathways, open woodlands and abundant wildlife, it evoked a country estate in England. Bill Gammage has discovered this was because Aboriginal people managed the land in a far more systematic and scientific fashion than we have ever realised. For over a decade, he has examined written and visual records of the Australian landscape. He has uncovered an extraordinarily complex system of land management using fire, the life cycles of native plants, and the natural flow of water to ensure plentiful wildlife and plant foods throughout the year. We know Aboriginal people spent far less time and effort than Europeans in securing food and shelter, and now we know how they did it. With details of land-management strategies from around Australia, THE BIGGEST ESTATE ON EARTH rewrites the history of this continent, with huge implications for us today. Once Aboriginal people were no longer able to tend their country, it became overgrown and vulnerable to the hugely damaging bushfires we now experience. And what we think of as virgin bush in a national park is nothing of the kind.
My Review
This was an interesting book that demonstrated pretty convincing evidence that a lot of Australian bushland was quite open before white settlement. A great number of references to the park like land that the early white people documented along with the numerous fires that the aborigines lit is in the book. In fact this theme is a common thread through the book, partly because Bill Gammage wanted to provide a strong case for his assessment what the land was like as some academics do not want to believe that aborigines were capable of sophisticated land management.
That aborigines had a close connection to the land is beyond dispute, but the evidence in this book was enough to convince me that they believed that looking after the land was of the utmost importance, and that they managed it by taking into account the type of country and the flora and other conditions present.
Book Details
One man saved the British Royal Family in the first decades of the 20th century – amazingly he was an almost unknown, and certainly unqualified, speech therapist called Lionel Logue, whom one newspaper in the 1930s famously dubbed ‘The Quack who saved a King’.
Logue wasn’t a British aristocrat or even an Englishman - he was a commoner and an Australian to boot. Nevertheless it was the outgoing, amiable Logue who single-handedly turned the famously nervous, tongue-tied, Duke of York into the man who was capable of becoming King.
Had Logue not saved Bertie (as the man who was to become King George VI was always known) from his debilitating stammer, and pathological nervousness in front of a crowd or microphone, then it is almost certain that the House of Windsor would have collapsed. The King’s Speech: How One Man Saved the British Monarchy is the previously untold story of the extraordinary relationship between Logue and the haunted young man who became King George VI, written with Logue’s grandson and drawn from Logue’s unpublished personal diaries. They throw extraordinary light on the intimacy of the two men – and the vital role the King’s wife, the late Queen Elizabeth, the Queen Mother, played in bringing them together to save her husband’s reputation and his career as King.
The King’s Speech: How One Man Saved the British Monarchy is an intimate portrait of the British monarchy at a time of its greatest crisis, seen through the eyes of an Australian commoner who was proud to serve, and save, his King.
My Review
After seeing the film I thought it would be interesting to read about Lionel Logue. The book is not the story of the film, but a biography on his life, although of course it covers the episodes that are the film. It is quite an easy book to read and I did not find it became tedious at all. It is just about the right length for such a book.
Rating 3/5
This book gives a good insight into the character of Ludwig Leichhardt and his eventual explorations in Australia. It is a well written and informative book and easy to read.
In his formative years Ludwig Leichhardt decided he would like to explore and find new areas, but he spent this time studying range of subjects, including medicine. However he did not sit for exams and although very knowledgeable, never gained formal qualifications.
When first coming to Australia Leichhardt wandered about the bush, marvelling at a land so different from Europe. He would study the plants, animals and geology of areas and make copious notes. It is from his notes and diaries that John Bailey has tapped into, to tell the story.
The expedition Leichhardt arranged to cross from Brisbane to Port Essington, on the Northern Territory coast not that far from the current Darwin, took an great deal longer than expected, partly due to mishaps and partly due to Leichhardt spending time investigating things. Some of his descriptions and that of John Gilbert, who was one of the 10 members of the party) described in glowing terms the beauty of many of the spots they passed through or camped. Gilbert in particular worried that this beauty would all change once white settlers reached these spots.
On return to Sydney Leichhardt began to set up a second expedition with the plan to follow the start of his previous one then turn west and south the cross the continent to the Swan River settlement in Western Australia. This was a total disaster with a large number of the expedition animals constantly wandering off at night, continuous rain and long periods of illness among the party; most likely caused by rotten meat. There was very little harmony in the party and with the loss of so many animals and insufficient supplies Leichhardt had little choice to abandon the trip. He very soon set up another expedition in an endeavour to achieve his objective, but, once the party left the last outpost, was never heard of again.
Rating 4/5
This is both a book about mountaineering and investigative writing. In part it deals with Graham Ratcliffe's alpine climbing, but it generally does so to show how it related to the events of May 1996 when a number of climbers died on Mount Everest. He doesn't go into too much detail about his climbs which is good from my perspective. Graham was high on the mountain when the tragedy arose and was left wondering what would have happened if his team new had been called upon to help with the rescue.
Eventually, but after several years had elapsed, the event came to so haunt him that he spent many years of his life as he painstakingly tried to establish if weather predictions were known by the leaders of the mountaineering teams and, if so, why did they ignore these dire predictions. Serious questions are also raised about the avoidance of these matters by people who wrote books about the tragedy, especially Jon Krakauer (Into Thin Air) and David Breashears (High Exposure).
Rating 3/5
An interesting book that held my interest. Paul Gilding describes the problems of the finite resources that we are using at a rate that means they can not last based on the scientific and mathematical evidence; facts that many people readily agree with. His conclusion is that we won't change until the economic consequences of this starts to come into play. He is confident that we will act and act very quickly when things become dire; virtually on a war footing. I would have liked to have had more of his views as to how some of the problems, such as population and water shortages caused by global warming, might pan out. A book well worth reading.
Rating 4/5